Cambridge Healthtech Institute’s 12th Annual

Protein Stability & Formulation

Ensuring Safety, Efficacy and Formulation-Fit

13 November 2025 ALL TIMES WET (GMT/UTC)


Cambridge Healthtech Institute’s 12th Annual Protein Stability & Formulation conference examines advanced approaches for enhancing biotherapeutic stability and formulation-fit. Sessions highlight statistical and AI approaches for stability prediction across modalities, overcoming ultralow concentration formulation and co-formulation challenges, and mitigating immunogenicity risk durign drug design. The conference shares creative approaches to to ensure the development of stable, safe, and efficacious biologics in the best formulation and delivery device.

Recommended Short Course*
Monday, 10 November, 14:00 – 17:00
SC1: Best Practices and Advanced Applications for Label-Free Interaction Analysis in Therapeutic Antibody Discovery
*Separate registration required. See short courses page for details. All short courses take place in-person only.

Thursday, 13 November

07:30Registration and Morning Coffee

NEW APPROACHES IN STABILITY PREDICTION

08:25

Chairperson's Remarks

Karoline B. Bechtold-Peters, PhD, Director, Science & Technology, Drug Product Develoment Biologics, Novartis Pharma AG

08:30

In vivo Disulfide Bond Stability—A Critical Factor for PK and PD Profiles of Insulins

Christian N. Cramer, Senior Principle Scientist, Discovery ADME, Novo Nordisk A/S

Longer-acting insulin variants can be engineered by a combination of lowering the receptor affinity and extending the half-life, e.g., by fatty-diacid derivatisation for reversible albumin binding. Key to this is to avoid unwanted non-receptor-mediated clearance mechanisms. In this presentation, we demonstrate by LC-MS that insulin undergo chain-splitting into free A- and B-chains via disulfide rearrangement as an unexpected clearance mechanism, and that engineering by amino acid substitutions can reduce this.

09:00

Strategy of Forced Degradation Study and Practical Uses of the Samples for Characterisation of the Products

Shusuke Nambu, PhD, Chief Scientist, Analytical Development Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

Chugai has a clear strategy for sample preparation of forced degradation regarding to manufacturing process of each product. In addition, the samples are used for the characterisation of products including peak characterisation of purity tests and bioassay. This presentation introduces the strategy and some case studies of products, including some unique molecules developed in Chugai.

09:30 Particle Analysis and Formulation – Enabling Safer, More Stable Biotherapeutics

Philippe Boniteau, Sr Market Application Specialist, Sales, Waters Corporation

Paul Dyer, Principal Market Applications Specialist, Sales, Waters Corporation

As biotherapeutics advance, maintain therapeutic stability and avoiding particle formation is even more challenging, but essential to ensure safety, efficacy, and compliance. Submicron and subvisible particles—aggregates and contaminants—are CQAs impacting immunogenicity and stability. Technologies like DLS + SLS, and BMI + FMM offer deep insight into aggregation and optimal formulation, enabling development of robustness and stability therapies.

10:00Coffee Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing

10:45

Statistical and AI Approaches to Predict Long-Term Stability

David J. Brockwell, PhD, Professor, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds

The emergence of machine learning and artificial intelligence is transforming discovery bioscience and the biologic development pipeline. In this talk, I will present two disparate methods to identify tractable protein sequences early in development—a high-throughput in vivo assay to generate large volumes of genotype-phenotype training datasets and a statistical method to identify key predictors of long term stability.

11:15

Generalising from Sparse Data: NanoMelt and Microfluidic Excipient Profiling for Nanobody Thermostability and Antibody-Excipient Solubility Predictions

Pietro Sormanni, PhD, Group Leader, Royal Society University Research Fellow, Chemistry of Health, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge

Modern antibody development hinges on accurate prediction of developability traits. However, training data are often scarce and heterogeneous. First, I will present a general ML framework to overcome this challenge, which combines pre-trained embeddings, stratified nested cross-validation, and ensemble learning to build sequence-based models that generalise to unseen regions of the sequence space. Deployed on nanobody thermostability, the resulting predictor, NanoMelt, remains accurate for sequences remote from the training set, and its forecasts accelerate nanobody selection in experimental tests. Second, we harness combinatorial droplet microfluidics to generate high-resolution solubility phase diagrams for clinical IgGs across panels of common excipients. Tens of thousands of datapoints per antibody show that, although most excipients improve solubility, the extent of that benefit is strongly molecule-dependent. Sequence- and structure-level analyses reveal the physicochemical motifs governing these responses, enabling targeted, minimal-screen formulation strategies. Together, these advances demonstrate how judicious use of limited data can unify predictive modelling and high-throughput experimentation to streamline antibody development.

11:45

Predicitve Stability for Biologics: Opportunities & Challenges

Andrea Junyan Ji, PhD, Senior Scientist, Pharmaceutical Development, Genentech, Inc.

Regulatory expectations, ICH Q1 revision, industry trend, applications, and challenges of the predictive stability for biologics will be discussed in this presentation.

12:15Attend Concurrent Session

12:45Luncheon in the Exhibit Hall with Last Chance for Poster Viewing

UNIQUE CHALLENGES IN PROTEIN AGGREGATION AND ULTRALOW CONCENTRATION PRODUCTS

13:55

Chairperson's Remarks

David J. Brockwell, PhD, Professor, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds

Sophie Tourdot, PhD, Immunogenicity Sciences Lead, BioMedicine Design, Pfizer

14:00

KEYNOTE PRESENTATION: Proteins on the Rack—Mechanism of Protein Aggregation at Interfaces

Wolfgang Friess, PhD, Professor & Chair, Pharmaceutical Technology & Biopharmaceutics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen

Proteins face numerous interfaces from up-stream processing to patient application. Aggregation driven by the interfacial stress is a critical concern. The driving mechanisms of adsorption, compression and decompression, as well as protein self interaction are presented, which provides the basis for adequate counter measures.

14:30

Challenges of Using Ultralow Concentrated Clinical Products in MABEL Studies

Karoline B. Bechtold-Peters, PhD, Director, Science & Technology, Drug Product Develoment Biologics, Novartis Pharma AG

Conducting MABEL (Minimum Anticipated Biological Effect Level) studies with ultralow concentrated clinical products presents unique challenges. These include ensuring accurate dosing, maintaining product stability, and achieving reliable bioanalytical measurements. Analytical challenges involve precise quantification at low concentrations and ensuring compatibility studies demonstrate no drug loss during administration. Specification setting is difficult due to the low concentration, requiring rigorous reasoning. 

15:00 Monoacyl phosphatidylcholine as viable polysorbate alternative in parenteral protein formulations

Richard Wibel, Manager Scientific Marketing, Lipoid GmbH

Polysorbates (PS) are commonly used in parenteral protein formulations to mitigate interfacial stress but are prone to hydrolysis and oxidation. Therefore, monoacyl phospholipids (MAPLs) are introduced as potential alternative. Stabilization of mAbs, long-term stability, accelerated stability studies with porcine liver esterase and hydrogen peroxide and in vitro hemolysis were investigated. MAPLs offer comparable or improved stabilization, along with enhanced chemical stability, making them a promising PS alternative.

15:15Transition to Interactive Discussions

INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS

15:30Find Your Table and Meet Your Discussion Moderator

Interactive Breakout Discussions are informal, moderated discussions, allowing participants to exchange ideas and experiences and develop future collaborations around a focused topic. Each discussion will be led by a facilitator who keeps the discussion on track and the group engaged. To get the most out of this format, please come prepared to share examples from your work, be a part of a collective, problem-solving session, and participate in active idea sharing. Please visit the Interactive Breakout Discussions page on the conference website for a complete listing of topics and descriptions.

TABLE 7:

AI/ML Approaches to Predict Long-Term Stability

David J. Brockwell, PhD, Professor, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds

  • Methods to identify protein sequences early in development
  • Bridging prediction and experimentation
  • Applications in developability assessments, stability and formulation design
TABLE 8:

Mitigating Immunogenicity and Enhancing Biophysical Properties in Drug Design

Sophie Tourdot, PhD, Immunogenicity Sciences Lead, BioMedicine Design, Pfizer

  • Starting risk mitigation process early in drug development
  • Incorporating advanced in silico and in vitro de-immunisaion tools into proten engineering process
  • Balancing immunogenicity risk and desired biophysical properties

FORMULATION DEVELOPEMENT

16:10

Formulation Development and Delivery Challenges for Novel Bispecifics

Jordan W. Bye, PhD, Principal Formulation Development Scientist I, CMC, Immunocore Ltd.

The talk will introduce our ImmTAX molecules and explain how they work. This presentation will present data on our formulation optimisation process and discuss challenges we face when delivering ImmTAX to patients.

16:40

Droplet Microfluidic Platform for Characterisation of Precipitation and Phase Separation of Biologics

Nikolai Lorenzen, PhD, Scientific Director, Biophysics and Injectable Formulation, Novo Nordisk AS

I will share advances within application of a droplet microfluidic platform, phase scan, in biophysical characterisation, and formulation development of biologics. Data shared will be a blend of recently published and unpublished material from collaboration between the research group of Professor Tuomas Knowles at University of Cambridge and the Drug Product Research area at Novo Nordisk and include examples such as:

  • Analysis of peptide precipitation 
  • Analysis of mAb phase separation

And a snapshot of bayesian optimisation guided multiparameter formulation development from collaboration with Professor Paolo Arosio from ETH Zürich will be given.

MITIGATING PARTICLE FORMATION AND IMMUNOGENICITY RISKS

17:10

Mitigation of Immunogenicity during Drug Design

Sophie Tourdot, PhD, Immunogenicity Sciences Lead, BioMedicine Design, Pfizer

Unwanted immune responses to biopharmaceuticals can affect their safety and efficacy. Where necessary, unintended immunogenicity will be mitigated in the clinic, but mitigation should preferably start early in development, at the drug design phase. This presentation discusses incorporating advanced in silico and in vitro de-immunisation tools into protein engineering processes to select a lead candidate that balances immunogenicity risk and desired biophysical properties.

17:40

The Connection between Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation, Protein Particle Formation, and Immunogenicity

Vito Foderà, PhD, Professor, Biophysics, University of Copenhagen

The ability of proteins to aggregate is a major challenge upon the development of therapeutic products. Understanding how protein-protein and protein-solvent interactions determine the stability, self-assembly kinetics and morphology of the aggregates is a conditio sine qua non to unravel the mechanisms ruling the self-assembly reaction. I will present our approach based on fluorescence microscopy, X-ray scattering and spectroscopy, aimed at identifying the interactions responsible for protein and antibody phase separation, conformational changes and colloidal instability, and how those aspects are linked to the variability in the aggregate morphologies. I will also discuss the potential role of different aggregates in inducing immunoresponse depending on their structure, size, and morphology. Our findings provide a scenario in which heterogeneous structures can be generated as a result of interconnected aggregation pathways, being this aspect of relevance for the design of stable pharmaceutical formulations.

18:10Close of Summit





No Agenda API URL configured.